bookwyrmvsLidaTube
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| bookwyrm | LidaTube | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #26 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums | #22 of 31 in Music |
| GitHub stars | 2 807 | 367 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +21 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 16 |
| Latest release | v0.9.3 · 9 Sept 2026 | v0.2.58 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
bookwyrm scores 58/100 against 46/100 for LidaTube, so it is the safer default.
LidaTube ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for bookwyrm.
If you want the quickest setup, LidaTube is easier to run; bookwyrm needs more configuration.
bookwyrm is growing faster right now (+21 stars in 30 days).
bookwyrm details →LidaTube details →