bookorbitvssupabase-automated-self-host
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| bookorbit | supabase-automated-self-host | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Book Management | #13 of 15 in Backend as a Service |
| GitHub stars | 5 894 | 506 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 264 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 23 | 0 |
| Latest release | v3.6.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
bookorbit scores 73/100 against 48/100 for supabase-automated-self-host, so it is the safer default.
bookorbit ships more often: 23 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for supabase-automated-self-host.
If you want the quickest setup, bookorbit is easier to run; supabase-automated-self-host needs more configuration.
bookorbit is growing faster right now (+1 264 stars in 30 days).
bookorbit details →supabase-automated-self-host details →
Swap a project
Keep bookorbit, compare it with
Keep supabase-automated-self-host, compare it with