bookorbitvssolidtime
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| bookorbit | solidtime | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Book Management | #3 of 11 in Time Tracking |
| GitHub stars | 5 899 | 9 055 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 221 | +127 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 23 | 20 |
| Latest release | v3.6.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | v0.22.1 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | PHP |
Which one should you pick?
bookorbit scores 74/100 against 69/100 for solidtime, so it is the safer default.
bookorbit ships more often: 23 stable releases in the past year, against 20 for solidtime.
If you want the quickest setup, bookorbit is easier to run; solidtime needs more configuration.
bookorbit is growing faster right now (+1 221 stars in 30 days).
bookorbit details →solidtime details →
Swap a project
Keep bookorbit, compare it with
Keep solidtime, compare it with