bookorbitvsrudderstack
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| bookorbit | rudderstack | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Book Management | #1 of 3 in Customer Data Platform |
| GitHub stars | 5 889 | 4 508 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 259 | +20 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 23 | 39 |
| Latest release | v3.6.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | v1.92.1 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
bookorbit scores 73/100 against 63/100 for rudderstack, so it is the safer default.
rudderstack ships more often: 39 stable releases in the past year, against 23 for bookorbit.
If you want the quickest setup, bookorbit is easier to run; rudderstack needs more configuration.
bookorbit is growing faster right now (+1 259 stars in 30 days).
bookorbit details →rudderstack details →
Swap a project
Keep bookorbit, compare it with
Keep rudderstack, compare it with