bookorbitvsRSSerpent
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| bookorbit | RSSerpent | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 41/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Book Management | #63 of 85 in Feed Reader |
| GitHub stars | 5 901 | 204 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 223 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 23 | 0 |
| Latest release | v3.6.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
bookorbit scores 74/100 against 41/100 for RSSerpent, so it is the safer default.
bookorbit ships more often: 23 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for RSSerpent.
bookorbit is growing faster right now (+1 223 stars in 30 days).
bookorbit details →RSSerpent details →
Swap a project
Keep bookorbit, compare it with
Keep RSSerpent, compare it with