bookorbitvsPostHog
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| bookorbit | PostHog | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Book Management | #1 of 27 in Analytics |
| GitHub stars | 5 894 | 40 499 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 216 | +580 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 23 | 3506 |
| Latest release | v3.6.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | agent-skills-v0.3896.0 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
PostHog scores 81/100 against 74/100 for bookorbit, so it is the safer default.
PostHog ships more often: 3506 stable releases in the past year, against 23 for bookorbit.
If you want the quickest setup, bookorbit is easier to run; PostHog needs more configuration.
bookorbit is growing faster right now (+1 216 stars in 30 days).
bookorbit details →PostHog details →
Swap a project
Keep bookorbit, compare it with
Keep PostHog, compare it with