bookorbitvsPimcore
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| bookorbit | Pimcore | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Book Management | #6 of 18 in Content Management |
| GitHub stars | 5 900 | 3 883 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 222 | +28 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 23 | 35 |
| Latest release | v3.6.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | v2026.3.3.1 · 22 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | PHP |
Which one should you pick?
bookorbit scores 74/100 against 61/100 for Pimcore, so it is the safer default.
Pimcore ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 23 for bookorbit.
If you want the quickest setup, bookorbit is easier to run; Pimcore needs more configuration.
bookorbit is growing faster right now (+1 222 stars in 30 days).
bookorbit details →Pimcore details →
Swap a project
Keep bookorbit, compare it with
Keep Pimcore, compare it with