bookorbitvspenpot
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| bookorbit | penpot | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 84/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Book Management | #1 of 30 in Collaboration |
| GitHub stars | 5 889 | 61 801 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 259 | +1 489 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 23 | 12 |
| Latest release | v3.6.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | 2.18.5 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Clojure |
Which one should you pick?
penpot scores 84/100 against 73/100 for bookorbit, so it is the safer default.
bookorbit ships more often: 23 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for penpot.
If you want the quickest setup, bookorbit is easier to run; penpot needs more configuration.
bookorbit details →penpot details →
Swap a project
Keep bookorbit, compare it with
Keep penpot, compare it with