bookorbitvsOpenTTD
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| bookorbit | OpenTTD | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Book Management | #1 of 23 in Gaming |
| GitHub stars | 5 882 | 8 434 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 252 | +137 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 23 | 4 |
| Latest release | v3.6.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | 15.3 · 4 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | C |
Which one should you pick?
bookorbit and OpenTTD score the same (73/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.
bookorbit ships more often: 23 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for OpenTTD.
If you want the quickest setup, bookorbit is easier to run; OpenTTD needs more configuration.
bookorbit is growing faster right now (+1 252 stars in 30 days).
bookorbit details →OpenTTD details →
Swap a project
Keep bookorbit, compare it with
Keep OpenTTD, compare it with