bookorbitvsOpenTakeoff
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| bookorbit | OpenTakeoff | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Book Management | #22 of 45 in Project Management |
| GitHub stars | 5 877 | 714 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 247 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 23 | 9 |
| Latest release | v3.6.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | mcp-v0.9.100 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
bookorbit scores 73/100 against 56/100 for OpenTakeoff, so it is the safer default.
bookorbit ships more often: 23 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for OpenTakeoff.
If you want the quickest setup, bookorbit is easier to run; OpenTakeoff needs more configuration.
bookorbit is growing faster right now (+1 247 stars in 30 days).
bookorbit details →OpenTakeoff details →
Swap a project
Keep bookorbit, compare it with
Keep OpenTakeoff, compare it with