bookorbitvsMCSManager
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| bookorbit | MCSManager | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 68/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Book Management | #8 of 62 in Game Servers |
| GitHub stars | 5 899 | 5 004 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 221 | +35 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 23 | 20 |
| Latest release | v3.6.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | v10.22.0 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
bookorbit scores 74/100 against 68/100 for MCSManager, so it is the safer default.
bookorbit ships more often: 23 stable releases in the past year, against 20 for MCSManager.
bookorbit is growing faster right now (+1 221 stars in 30 days).
bookorbit details →MCSManager details →
Swap a project
Keep bookorbit, compare it with
Keep MCSManager, compare it with