bookorbitvsInfisical
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| bookorbit | Infisical | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Book Management | #1 of 12 in Secrets Management |
| GitHub stars | 5 877 | 30 096 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 247 | +697 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 23 | 79 |
| Latest release | v3.6.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | v0.167.4 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Infisical scores 78/100 against 73/100 for bookorbit, so it is the safer default.
Infisical ships more often: 79 stable releases in the past year, against 23 for bookorbit.
If you want the quickest setup, bookorbit is easier to run; Infisical needs more configuration.
bookorbit details →Infisical details →
Swap a project
Keep bookorbit, compare it with
Keep Infisical, compare it with