bookorbitvsHiClaw
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| bookorbit | HiClaw | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 67/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Book Management | #32 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 5 889 | 5 886 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 259 | +223 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 23 | 15 |
| Latest release | v3.6.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | v1.2.5 · 16 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
bookorbit scores 73/100 against 67/100 for HiClaw, so it is the safer default.
bookorbit ships more often: 23 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for HiClaw.
bookorbit is growing faster right now (+1 259 stars in 30 days).
bookorbit details →HiClaw details →
Swap a project
Keep bookorbit, compare it with
Keep HiClaw, compare it with