bookorbitvsgrowthbook
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| bookorbit | growthbook | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Book Management | #3 of 8 in Feature Flags |
| GitHub stars | 5 908 | 8 547 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 230 | +122 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 23 | 6 |
| Latest release | v3.6.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | v5.1.0 · 22 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
bookorbit scores 74/100 against 71/100 for growthbook, so it is the safer default.
bookorbit ships more often: 23 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for growthbook.
If you want the quickest setup, bookorbit is easier to run; growthbook needs more configuration.
bookorbit is growing faster right now (+1 230 stars in 30 days).
bookorbit details →growthbook details →
Swap a project
Keep bookorbit, compare it with
Keep growthbook, compare it with