bookorbitvsgluetun
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| bookorbit | gluetun | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Book Management | #5 of 56 in VPN |
| GitHub stars | 5 886 | 15 909 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 256 | +311 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 23 | 8 |
| Latest release | v3.6.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | v3.41.3 · 30 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
gluetun scores 75/100 against 73/100 for bookorbit, so it is the safer default.
bookorbit ships more often: 23 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for gluetun.
If you want the quickest setup, bookorbit is easier to run; gluetun needs more configuration.
bookorbit is growing faster right now (+1 256 stars in 30 days).
bookorbit details →gluetun details →
Swap a project
Keep bookorbit, compare it with
Keep gluetun, compare it with