bookorbitvsdocker-pi-hole
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| bookorbit | docker-pi-hole | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 77/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Book Management | #3 of 41 in DNS |
| GitHub stars | 5 900 | 11 728 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 222 | +113 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 23 | 12 |
| Latest release | v3.6.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | 2026.10.0 · 17 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
docker-pi-hole scores 77/100 against 74/100 for bookorbit, so it is the safer default.
bookorbit ships more often: 23 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for docker-pi-hole.
bookorbit is growing faster right now (+1 222 stars in 30 days).
bookorbit details →docker-pi-hole details →
Swap a project
Keep bookorbit, compare it with
Keep docker-pi-hole, compare it with