Blackbox exportervsQtap
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Blackbox exporter | Qtap | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 70/100 | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 51 in Monitoring & observability | #21 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 5 922 | 1 465 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +16 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.29.1 · 21 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | C |
Which one should you pick?
Blackbox exporter scores 70/100 against 51/100 for Qtap, so it is the safer default.
Blackbox exporter ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Qtap.
If you want the quickest setup, Blackbox exporter is easier to run; Qtap needs more configuration.
Blackbox exporter is growing faster right now (+16 stars in 30 days).
Blackbox exporter details →Qtap details →
Swap a project
Keep Blackbox exporter, compare it with
Keep Qtap, compare it with