Blackbox exportervsKestra
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Blackbox exporter | Kestra | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 70/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 51 in Monitoring & observability | #3 of 32 in Workflow Automation |
| GitHub stars | 5 922 | 30 059 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +16 | +1 724 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 59 |
| Latest release | v0.29.1 · 21 Oct 2026 | v1.3.45 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Java |
Which one should you pick?
Kestra scores 82/100 against 70/100 for Blackbox exporter, so it is the safer default.
Kestra ships more often: 59 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for Blackbox exporter.
If you want the quickest setup, Blackbox exporter is easier to run; Kestra needs more configuration.
Kestra is growing faster right now (+1 724 stars in 30 days).
Blackbox exporter details →Kestra details →
Swap a project
Keep Blackbox exporter, compare it with
Keep Kestra, compare it with