bitmagnetvssupabase
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| bitmagnet | supabase | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 59/100 | 92/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 7 in Torrent | #1 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 4 438 | 114 278 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +67 | +3 530 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 8 |
| Latest release | v0.10.1 · 21 May 2026 | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
supabase scores 92/100 against 59/100 for bitmagnet, so it is the safer default.
supabase ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for bitmagnet.
If you want the quickest setup, bitmagnet is easier to run; supabase needs more configuration.
supabase is growing faster right now (+3 530 stars in 30 days).
bitmagnet details →supabase details →
Swap a project
Keep bitmagnet, compare it with
Keep supabase, compare it with