qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io)vssupabase
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io) | supabase | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 92/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 7 in Torrent | #1 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 1 759 | 114 278 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +22 | +3 530 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 52 | 8 |
| Latest release | 5.3.0_v2.1.2-ls485 · 25 Oct 2026 | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Dockerfile | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
supabase scores 92/100 against 67/100 for qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io), so it is the safer default.
qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io) ships more often: 52 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for supabase.
If you want the quickest setup, qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io) is easier to run; supabase needs more configuration.
supabase is growing faster right now (+3 530 stars in 30 days).
qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io) details →supabase details →