bitmagnetvsllama.cpp
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| bitmagnet | llama.cpp | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 59/100 | 93/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 7 in Torrent | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference |
| GitHub stars | 4 438 | 132 689 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +67 | +3 234 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 1464 |
| Latest release | v0.10.1 · 21 May 2026 | b11978 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | C++ |
Which one should you pick?
llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 59/100 for bitmagnet, so it is the safer default.
llama.cpp ships more often: 1464 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for bitmagnet.
llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 234 stars in 30 days).
bitmagnet details →llama.cpp details →
Swap a project
Keep bitmagnet, compare it with
Keep llama.cpp, compare it with