Bitfocus CompanionvsQtap
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Bitfocus Companion | Qtap | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 104 in Home Automation | #21 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 2 345 | 1 465 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +46 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 | 0 |
| Latest release | v5.1.1 · 21 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | C |
Which one should you pick?
Bitfocus Companion scores 68/100 against 51/100 for Qtap, so it is the safer default.
Bitfocus Companion ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Qtap.
If you want the quickest setup, Bitfocus Companion is easier to run; Qtap needs more configuration.
Bitfocus Companion is growing faster right now (+46 stars in 30 days).
Bitfocus Companion details →Qtap details →
Swap a project
Keep Bitfocus Companion, compare it with
Keep Qtap, compare it with