Bitfocus CompanionvsPruneMate
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Bitfocus Companion | PruneMate | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 104 in Home Automation | #5 of 5 in Docker Management |
| GitHub stars | 2 345 | 468 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +46 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 | 10 |
| Latest release | v5.1.1 · 21 Oct 2026 | V1.3.3 · 15 Feb 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | HTML |
Which one should you pick?
Bitfocus Companion scores 68/100 against 46/100 for PruneMate, so it is the safer default.
Bitfocus Companion ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for PruneMate.
If you want the quickest setup, PruneMate is easier to run; Bitfocus Companion needs more configuration.
Bitfocus Companion is growing faster right now (+46 stars in 30 days).
Bitfocus Companion details →PruneMate details →
Swap a project
Keep Bitfocus Companion, compare it with
Keep PruneMate, compare it with