BigBlueButtonvsquik
Two self-hosted Video Conferencing projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| BigBlueButton | quik | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 25 in Video Conferencing | #23 of 25 in Video Conferencing |
| GitHub stars | 9 258 | 193 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +31 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 | 0 |
| Latest release | v3.0.40 · 28 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | LGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
BigBlueButton scores 73/100 against 39/100 for quik, so it is the safer default.
BigBlueButton ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for quik.
If you want the quickest setup, quik is easier to run; BigBlueButton needs more configuration.
BigBlueButton is growing faster right now (+31 stars in 30 days).
BigBlueButton details →quik details →All Video Conferencing projects →
Swap a project
Keep BigBlueButton, compare it with
Keep quik, compare it with