BentoPDFvsWPS Office
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| BentoPDF | WPS Office | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 52/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Document Processing | #6 of 6 in Office Suites |
| GitHub stars | 16 180 | 196 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +481 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 21 |
| Latest release | v2.8.10 · 19 Oct 2026 | 11.1.0.11723-2-ls194 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Dockerfile |
Which one should you pick?
BentoPDF scores 77/100 against 52/100 for WPS Office, so it is the safer default.
WPS Office ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for BentoPDF.
If you want the quickest setup, BentoPDF is easier to run; WPS Office needs more configuration.
BentoPDF is growing faster right now (+481 stars in 30 days).
BentoPDF details →WPS Office details →
Swap a project
Keep BentoPDF, compare it with
Keep WPS Office, compare it with