BentoPDFvsWakupator
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| BentoPDF | Wakupator | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 43/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Document Processing | #11 of 22 in Home Server |
| GitHub stars | 16 181 | 184 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +482 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 1 |
| Latest release | v2.8.10 · 19 Oct 2026 | v1.2.0 · 6 Feb 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | C |
Which one should you pick?
BentoPDF scores 77/100 against 43/100 for Wakupator, so it is the safer default.
BentoPDF ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Wakupator.
If you want the quickest setup, BentoPDF is easier to run; Wakupator needs more configuration.
BentoPDF is growing faster right now (+482 stars in 30 days).
BentoPDF details →Wakupator details →
Swap a project
Keep BentoPDF, compare it with
Keep Wakupator, compare it with