BentoPDFvsShelfBridge
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| BentoPDF | ShelfBridge | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Document Processing | #9 of 15 in Audiobook Management |
| GitHub stars | 16 176 | 158 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +477 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 15 |
| Latest release | v2.8.10 · 19 Oct 2026 | v1.23.13 · 10 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
BentoPDF scores 77/100 against 47/100 for ShelfBridge, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, BentoPDF is easier to run; ShelfBridge needs more configuration.
BentoPDF is growing faster right now (+477 stars in 30 days).
BentoPDF details →ShelfBridge details →
Swap a project
Keep BentoPDF, compare it with
Keep ShelfBridge, compare it with