BentoPDFvsPterodactyl
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| BentoPDF | Pterodactyl | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Document Processing | #5 of 62 in Game Servers |
| GitHub stars | 16 184 | 9 438 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +485 | +184 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 11 |
| Latest release | v2.8.10 · 19 Oct 2026 | v1.15.2 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | JavaScript | PHP |
Which one should you pick?
BentoPDF scores 77/100 against 75/100 for Pterodactyl, so it is the safer default.
BentoPDF ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for Pterodactyl.
If you want the quickest setup, BentoPDF is easier to run; Pterodactyl needs more configuration.
BentoPDF is growing faster right now (+485 stars in 30 days).
BentoPDF details →Pterodactyl details →
Swap a project
Keep BentoPDF, compare it with
Keep Pterodactyl, compare it with