BentoPDFvsPlausible Analytics
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| BentoPDF | Plausible Analytics | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Document Processing | #2 of 21 in Web analytics |
| GitHub stars | 16 188 | 29 708 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +477 | +501 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 3 |
| Latest release | v2.8.10 · 19 Oct 2026 | v3.2.1 · 1 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Elixir |
Which one should you pick?
Plausible Analytics scores 81/100 against 77/100 for BentoPDF, so it is the safer default.
BentoPDF ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for Plausible Analytics.
If you want the quickest setup, BentoPDF is easier to run; Plausible Analytics needs more configuration.
BentoPDF details →Plausible Analytics details →
Swap a project
Keep BentoPDF, compare it with
Keep Plausible Analytics, compare it with