BentoPDFvspenpot
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| BentoPDF | penpot | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 84/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Document Processing | #1 of 30 in Collaboration |
| GitHub stars | 16 188 | 61 809 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +477 | +1 467 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 12 |
| Latest release | v2.8.10 · 19 Oct 2026 | 2.18.5 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MPL-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Clojure |
Which one should you pick?
penpot scores 84/100 against 77/100 for BentoPDF, so it is the safer default.
BentoPDF ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for penpot.
If you want the quickest setup, BentoPDF is easier to run; penpot needs more configuration.
penpot is growing faster right now (+1 467 stars in 30 days).
BentoPDF details →penpot details →
Swap a project
Keep BentoPDF, compare it with
Keep penpot, compare it with