BentoPDFvsmultiwoven
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| BentoPDF | multiwoven | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Document Processing | #4 of 8 in Data Pipeline |
| GitHub stars | 16 190 | 1 683 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +479 | +5 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 26 |
| Latest release | v2.8.10 · 19 Oct 2026 | v0.136.0 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Ruby |
Which one should you pick?
BentoPDF scores 77/100 against 57/100 for multiwoven, so it is the safer default.
multiwoven ships more often: 26 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for BentoPDF.
If you want the quickest setup, BentoPDF is easier to run; multiwoven needs more configuration.
BentoPDF is growing faster right now (+479 stars in 30 days).
BentoPDF details →multiwoven details →
Swap a project
Keep BentoPDF, compare it with
Keep multiwoven, compare it with