BentoPDFvsmotionEye
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| BentoPDF | motionEye | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 65/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Document Processing | #4 of 24 in Video Surveillance |
| GitHub stars | 16 188 | 4 721 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +477 | +36 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 6 |
| Latest release | v2.8.10 · 19 Oct 2026 | 0.44.0 · 21 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
BentoPDF scores 77/100 against 65/100 for motionEye, so it is the safer default.
BentoPDF ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for motionEye.
BentoPDF is growing faster right now (+477 stars in 30 days).
BentoPDF details →motionEye details →
Swap a project
Keep BentoPDF, compare it with
Keep motionEye, compare it with