BentoPDFvsLubeLogger
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| BentoPDF | LubeLogger | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 65/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Document Processing | #2 of 5 in Vehicle Management |
| GitHub stars | 16 190 | 2 926 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +479 | +69 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 17 |
| Latest release | v2.8.10 · 19 Oct 2026 | v1.7.4 · 14 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
BentoPDF scores 77/100 against 65/100 for LubeLogger, so it is the safer default.
LubeLogger ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for BentoPDF.
BentoPDF is growing faster right now (+479 stars in 30 days).
BentoPDF details →LubeLogger details →
Swap a project
Keep BentoPDF, compare it with
Keep LubeLogger, compare it with