BentoPDFvsKong Gateway
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| BentoPDF | Kong Gateway | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Document Processing | #1 of 39 in API Gateway |
| GitHub stars | 16 188 | 44 319 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +477 | +129 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 3 |
| Latest release | v2.8.10 · 19 Oct 2026 | 3.9.4 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Lua |
Which one should you pick?
Kong Gateway scores 82/100 against 77/100 for BentoPDF, so it is the safer default.
BentoPDF ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for Kong Gateway.
If you want the quickest setup, BentoPDF is easier to run; Kong Gateway needs more configuration.
BentoPDF is growing faster right now (+477 stars in 30 days).
BentoPDF details →Kong Gateway details →
Swap a project
Keep BentoPDF, compare it with
Keep Kong Gateway, compare it with