Backstagevswoodpecker-ci
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Backstage | woodpecker-ci | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 166 in Developer Tools | #5 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 34 732 | 8 065 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +50 | +157 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 | 11 |
| Latest release | v1.57.0-next.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | v3.20.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Backstage scores 78/100 against 73/100 for woodpecker-ci, so it is the safer default.
Backstage ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for woodpecker-ci.
If you want the quickest setup, woodpecker-ci is easier to run; Backstage needs more configuration.
woodpecker-ci is growing faster right now (+157 stars in 30 days).
Backstage details →woodpecker-ci details →