BackstagevsWarpgate
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Backstage | Warpgate | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 166 in Developer Tools | #11 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 34 734 | 8 159 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +52 | +199 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 | 33 |
| Latest release | v1.57.0-next.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | v0.30.2 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Backstage scores 78/100 against 75/100 for Warpgate, so it is the safer default.
Warpgate ships more often: 33 stable releases in the past year, against 14 for Backstage.
If you want the quickest setup, Warpgate is easier to run; Backstage needs more configuration.
Warpgate is growing faster right now (+199 stars in 30 days).
Backstage details →Warpgate details →