BackstagevsStackRender
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Backstage | StackRender | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 166 in Developer Tools | #34 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 34 732 | 555 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +50 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 | 1 |
| Latest release | v1.57.0-next.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | v1.4.0 · 10 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Backstage scores 78/100 against 50/100 for StackRender, so it is the safer default.
Backstage ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for StackRender.
If you want the quickest setup, StackRender is easier to run; Backstage needs more configuration.
Backstage is growing faster right now (+50 stars in 30 days).
Backstage details →StackRender details →