BackstagevsHass-MCP
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Backstage | Hass-MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 166 in Developer Tools | #63 of 104 in Home Automation |
| GitHub stars | 34 737 | 351 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +55 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 | 9 |
| Latest release | v1.57.0-next.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | v0.6.1 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Backstage scores 79/100 against 50/100 for Hass-MCP, so it is the safer default.
Backstage ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Hass-MCP.
If you want the quickest setup, Hass-MCP is easier to run; Backstage needs more configuration.
Backstage is growing faster right now (+55 stars in 30 days).
Backstage details →Hass-MCP details →