Baby Buddyvswoodpecker-ci
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Baby Buddy | woodpecker-ci | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 66/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 31 in Health & Fitness | #5 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 2 934 | 8 066 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +39 | +158 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 11 |
| Latest release | v2.11.0 · 19 Sept 2026 | v3.20.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
woodpecker-ci scores 73/100 against 66/100 for Baby Buddy, so it is the safer default.
woodpecker-ci ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Baby Buddy.
If you want the quickest setup, Baby Buddy is easier to run; woodpecker-ci needs more configuration.
woodpecker-ci is growing faster right now (+158 stars in 30 days).
Baby Buddy details →woodpecker-ci details →
Swap a project
Keep Baby Buddy, compare it with
Keep woodpecker-ci, compare it with