avideovsWorkout.cool
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| avideo | Workout.cool | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 36 in Video Streaming | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 2 108 | 8 650 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +4 | +155 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 1 |
| Latest release | v29.6.0 · 26 Oct 2026 | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Workout.cool scores 66/100 against 58/100 for avideo, so it is the safer default.
avideo ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Workout.cool.
If you want the quickest setup, Workout.cool is easier to run; avideo needs more configuration.
Workout.cool is growing faster right now (+155 stars in 30 days).
avideo details →Workout.cool details →
Swap a project
Keep avideo, compare it with
Keep Workout.cool, compare it with