avideovsWallos
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| avideo | Wallos | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 | 67/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 36 in Video Streaming | #1 of 5 in Finance |
| GitHub stars | 2 109 | 8 762 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 | +185 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 36 |
| Latest release | v29.6.0 · 26 Oct 2026 | v5.10.2 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | PHP |
Which one should you pick?
Wallos scores 67/100 against 58/100 for avideo, so it is the safer default.
Wallos ships more often: 36 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for avideo.
If you want the quickest setup, Wallos is easier to run; avideo needs more configuration.
Wallos is growing faster right now (+185 stars in 30 days).
avideo details →Wallos details →
Swap a project
Keep avideo, compare it with
Keep Wallos, compare it with