Tube ArchivistvsWallos
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Tube Archivist | Wallos | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 67/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 118 in Media Server | #1 of 5 in Finance |
| GitHub stars | 8 552 | 8 763 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +83 | +186 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 36 |
| Latest release | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 | v5.10.2 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | PHP |
Which one should you pick?
Tube Archivist scores 72/100 against 67/100 for Wallos, so it is the safer default.
Wallos ships more often: 36 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Tube Archivist.
If you want the quickest setup, Wallos is easier to run; Tube Archivist needs more configuration.
Wallos is growing faster right now (+186 stars in 30 days).
Tube Archivist details →Wallos details →
Swap a project
Keep Tube Archivist, compare it with
Keep Wallos, compare it with