avideovsUrocissa
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| avideo | Urocissa | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 36 in Video Streaming | #11 of 19 in Photo Galleries |
| GitHub stars | 2 108 | 300 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +4 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 18 |
| Latest release | v29.6.0 · 26 Oct 2026 | 3.4.2 · 21 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
avideo scores 58/100 against 48/100 for Urocissa, so it is the safer default.
Urocissa ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for avideo.
If you want the quickest setup, Urocissa is easier to run; avideo needs more configuration.
avideo is growing faster right now (+4 stars in 30 days).
avideo details →Urocissa details →
Swap a project
Keep avideo, compare it with
Keep Urocissa, compare it with