avideovsR2R
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| avideo | R2R | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 36 in Video Streaming | #6 of 7 in RAG |
| GitHub stars | 2 109 | 8 049 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 | +2 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 0 |
| Latest release | v29.6.0 · 26 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
R2R scores 59/100 against 58/100 for avideo, so it is the safer default.
avideo ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for R2R.
If you want the quickest setup, R2R is easier to run; avideo needs more configuration.
avideo is growing faster right now (+5 stars in 30 days).
Swap a project
Keep avideo, compare it with
Keep R2R, compare it with