R2RvsSRS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| R2R | SRS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 59/100 | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 7 in RAG | #4 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 8 049 | 29 391 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 | +112 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 13 |
| Latest release | — | v7.0-a3 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | C |
Which one should you pick?
SRS scores 78/100 against 59/100 for R2R, so it is the safer default.
SRS ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for R2R.
SRS is growing faster right now (+112 stars in 30 days).
Swap a project
Keep R2R, compare it with
Keep SRS, compare it with