avideovsquackback
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| avideo | quackback | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 36 in Video Streaming | #9 of 14 in Customer Support |
| GitHub stars | 2 108 | 331 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +4 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 15 |
| Latest release | v29.6.0 · 26 Oct 2026 | v0.14.1 · 7 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
avideo scores 58/100 against 50/100 for quackback, so it is the safer default.
quackback ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for avideo.
If you want the quickest setup, quackback is easier to run; avideo needs more configuration.
avideo is growing faster right now (+4 stars in 30 days).
avideo details →quackback details →
Swap a project
Keep avideo, compare it with
Keep quackback, compare it with