Apache KafkavsWorkout.cool
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Apache Kafka | Workout.cool | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Message Broker | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 34 152 | 8 653 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +327 | +154 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 1 |
| Latest release | — | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Java | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Apache Kafka scores 83/100 against 66/100 for Workout.cool, so it is the safer default.
Workout.cool ships more often: 1 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Apache Kafka.
If you want the quickest setup, Workout.cool is easier to run; Apache Kafka needs more configuration.
Apache Kafka is growing faster right now (+327 stars in 30 days).
Apache Kafka details →Workout.cool details →