AutomatischvsSpeedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Automatisch | Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 33/100 |
| Rank in category | #9 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #46 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 14 003 | 144 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +23 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | — |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Automatisch scores 69/100 against 33/100 for Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana is easier to run; Automatisch needs more configuration.
Automatisch is growing faster right now (+23 stars in 30 days).
Automatisch details →Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana details →
Swap a project
Keep Automatisch, compare it with
Keep Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana, compare it with