AutomatischvsQtap
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Automatisch | Qtap | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #9 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #21 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 14 003 | 1 465 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +20 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | C |
Which one should you pick?
Automatisch scores 69/100 against 51/100 for Qtap, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, Automatisch is easier to run; Qtap needs more configuration.
Automatisch is growing faster right now (+20 stars in 30 days).
Automatisch details →Qtap details →