AudioMuse-AIvsZabbix
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| AudioMuse-AI | Zabbix | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 59 in Music Streaming | #13 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 2 826 | 6 521 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +183 | +109 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 38 | 0 |
| Latest release | v3.6.4 · 16 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go Template |
Which one should you pick?
Zabbix scores 75/100 against 67/100 for AudioMuse-AI, so it is the safer default.
AudioMuse-AI ships more often: 38 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zabbix.
If you want the quickest setup, AudioMuse-AI is easier to run; Zabbix needs more configuration.
AudioMuse-AI details →Zabbix details →
Swap a project
Keep AudioMuse-AI, compare it with
Keep Zabbix, compare it with